TONIGHT TONIGHT SIX TONIGHT SIX WIND TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT THE TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT THE
CENTER TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT THE
CENTER OF TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT THE
CENTER OF A TONIGHT SIX WIND TURBINE AT THE
CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY. CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY. CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST OF CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST OF ITS CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST OF ITS KIND CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST OF ITS KIND IN CENTER OF A CONTROVERSY.
THE FIRST OF ITS KIND IN NORTH THE FIRST OF ITS KIND IN NORTH PLACE PLACE IN PLACE IN LAKE PLACE IN LAKE ERIE. PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME SAY PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME SAY THAT PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME SAY THAT THESE PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 PLACE IN LAKE ERIE.
SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT
HIGH SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT
HIGH TURBINES SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT
HIGH TURBINES ARE SOME SAY THAT THESE 500 FOOT
HIGH TURBINES ARE HAZARDOUS. HIGH TURBINES ARE HAZARDOUS. HIGH TURBINES ARE HAZARDOUS.
TONIGHT, HIGH TURBINES ARE HAZARDOUS.
TONIGHT, RAY HIGH TURBINES ARE HAZARDOUS.
TONIGHT, RAY STRICKLAND DIGGING DIGGING INTO DIGGING INTO THE DIGGING INTO THE PROS DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A POSSIBILITY DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A POSSIBILITY OF DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A POSSIBILITY OF A DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND DIGGING INTO THE PROS AND CONS
OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM
IN OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM
IN OUR OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM
IN OUR GREAT OF A POSSIBILITY OF A WIND FARM
IN OUR GREAT LAKE. IN OUR GREAT LAKE. IN OUR GREAT LAKE.
>>IN OUR GREAT LAKE.
>>Reporter: IN OUR GREAT LAKE.
>>Reporter: THIS IN OUR GREAT LAKE.
>>Reporter: THIS WIND IN OUR GREAT LAKE.
>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT WILL>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT WILL BE>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT WILL BE THE>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST>>Reporter: THIS WIND ENERGY
PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER
FRESHWATER PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER
FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER
FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT PROJECT WILL BE THE FIRST EVER
FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT IN FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT IN FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT IN
NORTH FRESHWATER WIND PROJECT IN
NORTH AMERICA. NORTH AMERICA. NORTH AMERICA.
WE NORTH AMERICA.
WE HAVE NORTH AMERICA.
WE HAVE TO NORTH AMERICA.
WE HAVE TO STOP NORTH AMERICA.
WE HAVE TO STOP THERE NORTH AMERICA.
WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS A WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS A LOT WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS A LOT MORE WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT WE HAVE TO STOP THERE BECAUSE
THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO BE THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO BE DONE THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO BE DONE BEFORE THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO BE DONE BEFORE HISTORY THERE IS A LOT MORE THAT NEEDS
TO BE DONE BEFORE HISTORY IS TO BE DONE BEFORE HISTORY IS TO BE DONE BEFORE HISTORY IS
MADE. MADE. MADE.
A MADE.
A PUBLIC MADE.
A PUBLIC HEARING MADE.
A PUBLIC HEARING WITH MADE.
A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD
EARLIER A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD
EARLIER TODAY A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD
EARLIER TODAY FOR A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD
EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS A PUBLIC HEARING WITH HELD
EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS TO EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS TO EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS TO
VOICE EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS TO
VOICE THEIR EARLIER TODAY FOR FOLKS TO
VOICE THEIR CONCERN. VOICE THEIR CONCERN. VOICE THEIR CONCERN.
SUPPORTERS VOICE THEIR CONCERN.
SUPPORTERS OF VOICE THEIR CONCERN.
SUPPORTERS OF THE VOICE THEIR CONCERN.
SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT VOICE THEIR CONCERN.
SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE
BOASTING SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE
BOASTING ABOUT SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE
BOASTING ABOUT HOW SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE
BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS SUPPORTERS OF THE PROJECT ARE
BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A GREAT BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A GREAT IMPACT BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON THE BOASTING ABOUT HOW THIS CAN
HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON THE CITY HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON THE CITY HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON THE CITY
OF HAVE A GREAT IMPACT ON THE CITY
OF CLEVELAND. OF CLEVELAND. OF CLEVELAND.
WE OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT A OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT A LIST OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF OF CLEVELAND.
WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF PROS WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF PROS WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF PROS
AND WE PUT A LIST TOGETHER OF PROS
AND CONS. AND CONS. AND CONS.
ONE AND CONS.
ONE OF AND CONS.
ONE OF THE AND CONS.
ONE OF THE PROS AND CONS.
ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS AND CONS.
ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS
THE ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS
THE PROJECT ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS
THE PROJECT COULD ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS
THE PROJECT COULD OFFER ONE OF THE PROS SUPPORTERS SAYS
THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB
GROWTH THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB
GROWTH ACCORDING THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB
GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE PROJECT COULD OFFER JOB
GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE
DEVELOPERS, GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE
DEVELOPERS, THIS GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE
DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE GROWTH ACCORDING TO THE
DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM WILL DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM WILL CREATE DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM WILL CREATE 500 DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM WILL CREATE 500 JOBS DEVELOPERS, THIS OFFSHORE WIND
FARM WILL CREATE 500 JOBS IN FARM WILL CREATE 500 JOBS IN FARM WILL CREATE 500 JOBS IN
NORTHEAST FARM WILL CREATE 500 JOBS IN
NORTHEAST OHIO. NORTHEAST OHIO. IT IT IS IT IS A IT IS A SUCCESS, IT IS A SUCCESS, A IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE. IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER PRO, IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER PRO, A IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST TO IT IS A SUCCESS, A LOT MORE.
ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST TO THE ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST TO THE ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST TO THE
LOCAL ANOTHER PRO, A BOOST TO THE
LOCAL ECONOMY. LOCAL ECONOMY. LOCAL ECONOMY.
IF LOCAL ECONOMY.
IF IT’S LOCAL ECONOMY.
IF IT’S BILLED, LOCAL ECONOMY.
IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS LOCAL ECONOMY.
IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY
IT IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY
IT COULD IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY
IT COULD BRING IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY
IT COULD BRING 168 IF IT’S BILLED, DEVELOPERS SAY
IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION
DOLLARS IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION
DOLLARS AND IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION
DOLLARS AND LAST, IT COULD BRING 168 MILLION
DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY
OPPONENTS DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY
OPPONENTS DISAGREE DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY
OPPONENTS DISAGREE WITH DOLLARS AND LAST, MANY
OPPONENTS DISAGREE WITH THE OPPONENTS DISAGREE WITH THE OPPONENTS DISAGREE WITH THE
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPONENTS DISAGREE WITH THE
ENVIRONMENTAL DISPATCH IMPACT. IMPACT.
IT’S IMPACT.
IT’S A IMPACT.
IT’S A CLEAN, IMPACT.
IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT IMPACT.
IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT AND IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT AND IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT AND
RENEWABLE IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT AND
RENEWABLE ENERGY IT’S A CLEAN, ABUNDANT AND
RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE. RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE. RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE SPOKE RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE SPOKE TO RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE SPOKE TO DAVE RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE.
WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE
OF WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE
OF THE WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE
OF THE DEVELOPERS WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE
OF THE DEVELOPERS OF WE SPOKE TO DAVE KARPINSKI, ONE
OF THE DEVELOPERS OF THE OF THE DEVELOPERS OF THE OF THE DEVELOPERS OF THE
PROJECT. PROJECT. PROJECT.
HE PROJECT.
HE SAID PROJECT.
HE SAID THIS PROJECT.
HE SAID THIS PROJECT PROJECT.
HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL PROJECT.
HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE
GREAT HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE
GREAT FOR HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE
GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S HE SAID THIS PROJECT WILL BE
GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S FUTURE.>>GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S FUTURE.>>GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S FUTURE.>>
IT’S GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S FUTURE.>>
IT’S PROGRESSIVE, GREAT FOR CLEVELAND’S FUTURE.>>
IT’S PROGRESSIVE, IT’S THE THE FUTURE. THE FUTURE.
IT THE FUTURE.
IT WILL RETAIN RETAIN THE RETAIN THE TALENT RETAIN THE TALENT OF RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO BE RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO BE A RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO BE A PART RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF RETAIN THE TALENT OF THE PEOPLE
WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS. WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS. WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS.
WE WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS.
WE ARE WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS.
WE ARE EXCITED WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS.
WE ARE EXCITED FOR WHO WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS.
WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE
FUTURE.>>WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE
FUTURE.>>Reporter: WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE
FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON WE ARE EXCITED FOR THE
FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE
FLIPSIDE, FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE
FLIPSIDE, THERE FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE
FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE
FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE FUTURE.>>Reporter: ON THE
FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO
DISAGREE FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO
DISAGREE WITH FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO
DISAGREE WITH THIS FLIPSIDE, THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO
DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT. DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT. DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT.
MAINLY DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT.
MAINLY THEY DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT.
MAINLY THEY TALK DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT.
MAINLY THEY TALK ABOUT DISAGREE WITH THIS PROJECT.
MAINLY THEY TALK ABOUT THE MAINLY THEY TALK ABOUT THE MAINLY THEY TALK ABOUT THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MAINLY THEY TALK ABOUT THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.
OPPONENTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.
OPPONENTS BELIEVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.
OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.
OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES
COULD OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES
COULD KILL OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES
COULD KILL BIRDS, OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES
COULD KILL BIRDS, AND OPPONENTS BELIEVE THE TURBINES
COULD KILL BIRDS, AND OTHER COULD KILL BIRDS, AND OTHER COULD KILL BIRDS, AND OTHER
ANIMALS. ANIMALS. ANIMALS.
ANOTHER ANIMALS.
ANOTHER CONCERN, ANIMALS.
ANOTHER CONCERN, A ANIMALS.
ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE ANIMALS.
ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL
LEAK ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL
LEAK FROM ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL
LEAK FROM THE ANOTHER CONCERN, A POSSIBLE OIL
LEAK FROM THE TURBINES. LEAK FROM THE TURBINES. LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE IS LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE IS WHERE LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE GET LEAK FROM THE TURBINES.
LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE GET OUR LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE GET OUR LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE GET OUR
DRINKING LAKE ERIE IS WHERE WE GET OUR
DRINKING WATER. DRINKING WATER. DRINKING WATER.
PEOPLE DRINKING WATER.
PEOPLE SAY DRINKING WATER.
PEOPLE SAY LEAKS DRINKING WATER.
PEOPLE SAY LEAKS ARE PEOPLE SAY LEAKS ARE PEOPLE SAY LEAKS ARE
INEVITABLE. INEVITABLE. INEVITABLE.
ALSO INEVITABLE.
ALSO THE INEVITABLE.
ALSO THE COST INEVITABLE.
ALSO THE COST OF INEVITABLE.
ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE INEVITABLE.
ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND
FARMS ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND
FARMS ARE ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND
FARMS ARE MORE ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND
FARMS ARE MORE EXPENSIVE ALSO THE COST OF OFFSHORE WIND
FARMS ARE MORE EXPENSIVE THAN FARMS ARE MORE EXPENSIVE THAN FARMS ARE MORE EXPENSIVE THAN
ONSHORE. ONSHORE. ONSHORE.
THIS ONSHORE.
THIS PROJECT ONSHORE.
THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY ONSHORE.
THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS
GOING THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS
GOING TO THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS
GOING TO COST THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS
GOING TO COST ABOUT THIS PROJECT SPECIFICALLY IS
GOING TO COST ABOUT $120 GOING TO COST ABOUT $120 GOING TO COST ABOUT $120
MILLION. MILLION. MILLION.
TAXPAYERS MILLION.
TAXPAYERS ARE MILLION.
TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING MILLION.
TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING SOME MILLION.
TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING SOME OF TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING SOME OF TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING SOME OF
THE TAXPAYERS ARE PUTTING SOME OF
THE COST. THE COST. THE COST.
ONE THE COST.
ONE OF THE COST.
ONE OF THE THE COST.
ONE OF THE LAST THE COST.
ONE OF THE LAST CONS THE COST.
ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE COST.
ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT THAT ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT THAT TURBINES ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT THAT TURBINES COULD ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE ONE OF THE LAST CONS IS THE
FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN
EYESORE, FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN
EYESORE, AND FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN
EYESORE, AND THEY FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN
EYESORE, AND THEY COULD FACT THAT TURBINES COULD BE AN
EYESORE, AND THEY COULD BE EYESORE, AND THEY COULD BE EYESORE, AND THEY COULD BE
NOISY. NOISY. NOISY.
OPPONENTS NOISY.
OPPONENTS SAY NOISY.
OPPONENTS SAY COULD NOISY.
OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT NOISY.
OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF LAKE OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND THEN OPPONENTS SAY COULD AFFECT THE
BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND THEN IN BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND THEN IN BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND THEN IN
TURN, BEAUTY OF LAKE ERIE AND THEN IN
TURN, TOURISM. TURN, TOURISM. TURN, TOURISM.
>>TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY HAS TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY HAS THERE TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO TURN, TOURISM.
>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE->>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE->>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE-
SCALE>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE-
SCALE WIND>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE-
SCALE WIND TURBINE>>WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO LARGE-
SCALE WIND TURBINE IN SCALE WIND TURBINE IN SCALE WIND TURBINE IN
FRESHWATER? FRESHWATER? FRESHWATER?
BECAUSE FRESHWATER?
BECAUSE IT FRESHWATER?
BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER?
BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER FRESHWATER?
BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND
PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND
PEOPLE DRINK BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND
PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER BECAUSE IT IS FRESHWATER AND
PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY DON’T PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY DON’T WANT PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY DON’T WANT IT PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED PEOPLE DRINK FRESHWATER AND
THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP. THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP. THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP.
>>THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP.
>>Reporter: THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP.
>>Reporter: THIS THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP.
>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS THEY DON’T WANT IT FOULED UP.
>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS IS>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS IS>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS IS
FAR>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS IS
FAR FROM>>Reporter: THIS PROCESS IS
FAR FROM OVER. FAR FROM OVER. FAR FROM OVER.
THE FAR FROM OVER.
THE DEVELOPERS FAR FROM OVER.
THE DEVELOPERS HAVE FAR FROM OVER.
THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO FAR FROM OVER.
THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET FAR FROM OVER.
THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A
NUMBER THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A
NUMBER OF THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A
NUMBER OF PERMITS THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A
NUMBER OF PERMITS AND THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TO GET A
NUMBER OF PERMITS AND PERMIT NUMBER OF PERMITS AND PERMIT NUMBER OF PERMITS AND PERMIT
APPROVAL NUMBER OF PERMITS AND PERMIT
APPROVAL FROM